Boston, January 29, 2026
In a reaffirmation of its commitment to local governance, the Boston Police Department reported that it ignored all 57 civil immigration detainer requests from ICE in 2025. This decision, confirmed by Commissioner Michael Cox, aligns with the Boston Trust Act, ensuring non-compliance with federal immigration enforcement. The ordinance aims to foster trust within the community by delineating the role of local law enforcement in immigration matters. This policy reflects a broader trend among American cities navigating the balance between local and federal authority in immigration issues.
Boston
The Boston Police Department deliberately ignored all 57 civil immigration detainer requests it received from federal authorities in 2025, a decision recently confirmed by Police Commissioner Michael Cox. The department’s steadfast non-compliance is attributed to the mandates of the Boston Trust Act, a local ordinance designed to delineate the boundaries of cooperation between city law enforcement and federal immigration agencies.
Commissioner Cox’s statements, made within the last 48 hours, cast a clear light upon a policy of non-cooperation that remained absolute throughout the past year. The 57 requests, issued by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), sought the temporary detention of individuals for civil immigration purposes. Yet, each request was set aside, a quiet refusal reflecting the city’s established stance.
The Boston Trust Act and Its Implications
At the heart of this policy is the Boston Trust Act, which explicitly restricts the Boston Police Department from collaborating with ICE on such civil detainer requests. This legislative framework reflects a considered local position on the role of municipal law enforcement, distinguishing between criminal enforcement and federal immigration matters. It shapes the daily interactions between officers and the communities they serve, aiming to foster trust by ensuring individuals feel secure in reporting crimes without fear of immediate immigration consequence stemming from local police action.
The act underscores a broader discussion in many American cities regarding the appropriate balance between local autonomy and federal enforcement priorities. For those living within the city, it can represent a measure of certainty regarding their interactions with local police, offering a defined pathway in moments of vulnerability. For others, it highlights a perceived tension between local directives and the broader mandate of federal law.
Understanding Immigration Detainer Requests
Immigration detainer requests are typically administrative warrants issued by ICE, asking local law enforcement agencies to hold individuals for an additional period, usually up to 48 hours, beyond when they would otherwise be released. This requested hold allows federal agents time to take the individuals into custody for suspected immigration violations. These are distinct from criminal warrants, addressing civil immigration matters rather than criminal charges under local jurisdiction.
The decision by the Boston Police Department to consistently ignore these requests, 100% of the time in 2025, indicates a firm adherence to the local ordinance. This approach, while clear in its legal basis, touches upon the complex lives of individuals and families. It speaks to the human experience of navigating different layers of governance, where local policies can offer a distinct buffer from federal directives for those residing within city limits.
A Policy of Defined Boundaries
The consistent non-compliance illustrates Boston’s commitment to a specific interpretation of local law enforcement’s role. It means that an individual encountered by Boston Police, even if a detainer request from ICE exists, will not be held by local authorities solely for civil immigration purposes. This clarity, while perhaps viewed differently from various perspectives, provides a stable framework for the city’s residents and its police force. The policy, rooted in the Boston Trust Act, thus becomes a practical expression of local governance, influencing lives in its measured and deliberate application.
This situation invites reflection on the intricate tapestry of American federalism and the ways in which local communities chart their own paths in response to national policies. It is a quiet testament to the enduring dialogue between the pursuit of order and the cultivation of trust within a diverse populace.
Frequently Asked Questions
What did the Boston Police Department do regarding ICE detainer requests in 2025?
The Boston Police Department ignored all 57 civil immigration detainer requests it received from federal authorities in 2025.
Who confirmed this policy of non-compliance?
Boston Police Commissioner Michael Cox recently confirmed that the department ignored all 57 immigration detainer requests from ICE last year.
What is the reason cited for ignoring these requests?
The department’s non-compliance is attributed to the mandates of the Boston Trust Act, a local ordinance that prohibits the Boston Police Department from cooperating with ICE on such civil detainer requests.
How many detainer requests did the Boston Police Department receive from ICE in 2025?
The Boston Police Department received 57 total civil immigration detainer requests from ICE in 2025.
Are ICE detainer requests the same as criminal warrants?
No, ICE detainer requests are administrative warrants for civil immigration purposes, distinct from criminal warrants which address criminal charges under local jurisdiction.
Key Features of Boston Police Policy on ICE Detainers
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Number of Requests Ignored (2025) | 57 civil immigration detainer requests |
| Percentage of Requests Ignored | 100% |
| Authority for Non-Compliance | Boston Trust Act |
| Type of Requests | Civil immigration detainer requests from ICE |
| Period of Non-Compliance | Throughout 2025 |
| Official Confirming Policy | Boston Police Commissioner Michael Cox |
Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic
HERE Resources
Boston Police Department Issues Domestic Violence Advisories
Boston Police Official Sues Commissioner Over Retaliation Claims
Boston Police Seek Public Assistance in Assault Case
Planning Commissioners Approve New Boston Crossing Development
Boston Police Seek Notorious Thief Tyronne Burris
Boston Police Report Rise in Crimes and Scams Targeting Seniors
Challenges Intensify for Boston’s Immigrant Communities Amid Policy Shifts
Boston Police Report 278 Incidents Over 24 Hours
Federal Government Threatens MBTA with Funding Cuts Over Safety
Boston City Hall Faces Recount Delay After Water Main Break
Author: STAFF HERE BOSTON WRITER
The BOSTON STAFF WRITER represents the experienced team at HEREBoston.com, your go-to source for actionable local news and information in Boston, Suffolk County, and beyond. Specializing in "news you can use," we cover essential topics like product reviews for personal and business needs, local business directories, politics, real estate trends, neighborhood insights, and state news affecting the area—with deep expertise drawn from years of dedicated reporting and strong community input, including local press releases and business updates. We deliver top reporting on high-value events such as Boston Marathon, Head of the Charles Regatta, and Boston Harborfest. Our coverage extends to key organizations like the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce and Associated Industries of Massachusetts, plus leading businesses in finance, biotech, and insurance that power the local economy such as Fidelity Investments, Biogen, and Liberty Mutual Insurance. As part of the broader HERE network, we provide comprehensive, credible insights into Massachusetts's dynamic landscape.
