Boston, September 20, 2025
News Summary
The Boston City Council discussed a proposed ordinance aimed at regulating delivery vehicles such as mopeds and e-bikes, focusing on pedestrian safety while addressing economic concerns for drivers. Introduced by Councilor Ed Flynn, the ordinance calls for amendments to enhance safety measures following recent incidents, including pedestrian fatalities. The council highlighted a divide between ensuring safety and the potential negative economic impact on delivery drivers. The ordinance was referred to the Committee on Government Operations for further evaluation and discussion.
Boston — The Boston City Council held a debate on Wednesday, Sept. 17, regarding a proposed ordinance targeting delivery vehicles such as mopeds and e-bikes. The ordinance, introduced by Councilor Ed Flynn, centers on pedestrian safety and potential restrictions on two-wheeled delivery vehicles while prompting strong concerns about economic impacts on drivers and businesses. The ordinance was not voted on but referred to the Committee on Government Operations for further discussion.
Key developments and immediate implications
Councilor Ed Flynn introduced the ordinance, highlighting concerns about reckless driving by delivery drivers. Flynn advocated for traffic-calming measures, including raised crosswalks and stricter regulations, and emphasized that pedestrian safety has been a major issue for the city for nearly eight years. The ordinance proposed by Flynn called for an amendment to an earlier ordinance passed in April, which requires third-party delivery companies to obtain permits and provide safety data and liability insurance.
The April ordinance aims to address oversight of food delivery companies, which have increasingly utilized mopeds and e-bikes for deliveries. Flynn cited incidents of pedestrian injuries, including a recent fatality involving an e-bike near Copley Square, and attributed part of the problem to delivery company incentives that encourage speed. The city has seen a surge in food deliveries during the pandemic, leading to increased traffic law violations by delivery drivers. Boston’s 311 database has recorded numerous complaints about delivery vehicles disobeying traffic laws. Police Commissioner Michael Cox has increased enforcement efforts addressing reckless behavior by delivery drivers.
Safety vs. economic concerns
Council debate made clear there is a divide between councilors prioritizing public safety and those warning of unintended economic consequences. Some councilors expressed concerns about the quick implementation of the ordinance and its impact on vulnerable populations. Councilor Henry Santana cautioned against an outright ban, highlighting that it could impact the livelihoods of 33% of delivery drivers who rely on two-wheeled vehicles. Pepén argued for solutions that support drivers rather than penalizing them. Santana suggested focusing on education and better enforcement of existing laws rather than imposing bans. Pepén called for improved registration of delivery vehicles and better compliance measures. Councilor Sharon Durkan raised concerns about the ordinance’s timing, noting it had yet to be implemented.
Business and industry response
Industry reaction underscored potential economic disruption. DoorDash opposed the proposed ban, claiming it would eliminate one-third of all Boston deliveries, negatively affecting local businesses and workers. Councilor Julia Mejia suggested the council put pressure on delivery companies instead of targeting the drivers, indicating an appetite among some members to pursue corporate accountability and operational reform rather than blanket vehicle restrictions.
Next steps
The ordinance was not voted on but referred to the Committee on Government Operations for further discussion. That committee will consider amendments, hear testimony, and evaluate potential implementation timelines and enforcement strategies. Proposals under consideration include expanded traffic-calming measures, improved vehicle registration and compliance protocols, requirements for delivery companies to supply more detailed safety data, and targeted education and enforcement initiatives focused on driver behavior.
Background context
Food delivery usage increased substantially during the pandemic, prompting both a rise in delivery-related traffic incidents and public complaints to city services. The April ordinance required third-party delivery companies to obtain permits and provide safety data and liability insurance as a first step toward oversight. The September debate builds on that regulatory framework and reflects competing priorities: reducing pedestrian injuries and deaths while avoiding harm to workers—particularly low-income and immigrant drivers—who depend on delivery work.
What to watch
- Committee on Government Operations review schedule and any proposed amendments.
- Data and testimony on pedestrian injuries, enforcement outcomes, and delivery company practices.
- Any proposed timelines for implementing restrictions or alternative measures such as raised crosswalks and focused enforcement.
FAQ
What happened at the Boston City Council meeting on Sept. 17?
The Boston City Council held a debate on Wednesday, Sept. 17, regarding a proposed ordinance targeting delivery vehicles such as mopeds and e-bikes.
Who introduced the proposed ordinance and why?
Councilor Ed Flynn introduced the ordinance, highlighting concerns about reckless driving by delivery drivers.
What changes to city policy does the ordinance propose?
The ordinance proposed by Flynn called for an amendment to an earlier ordinance passed in April, which requires third-party delivery companies to obtain permits and provide safety data and liability insurance.
What safety incidents did councilors cite during the debate?
He cited incidents of pedestrian injuries, including a recent fatality involving an e-bike near Copley Square.
What enforcement and complaint data are relevant to the discussion?
Boston’s 311 database has recorded numerous complaints about delivery vehicles disobeying traffic laws.
What economic concerns were raised about the proposed ban?
Councilor Henry Santana cautioned against an outright ban, highlighting that it could impact the livelihoods of 33% of delivery drivers who rely on two-wheeled vehicles.
How did delivery companies respond?
DoorDash opposed the proposed ban, claiming it would eliminate one-third of all Boston deliveries, negatively affecting local businesses and workers.
What is the current status of the ordinance?
The ordinance was not voted on but referred to the Committee on Government Operations for further discussion.
Quick reference table
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Date of debate | Wednesday, Sept. 17 |
| City body | Boston City Council |
| Primary sponsor | Councilor Ed Flynn |
| Vehicles targeted | mopeds and e-bikes |
| Related April action | Requires third-party delivery companies to obtain permits and provide safety data and liability insurance |
| Reported safety incident | Recent fatality involving an e-bike near Copley Square |
| Enforcement | Police Commissioner Michael Cox has increased enforcement efforts |
| Economic impact cited | Could impact the livelihoods of 33% of delivery drivers who rely on two-wheeled vehicles |
| Industry position | DoorDash opposed the proposed ban, claiming it would eliminate one-third of all Boston deliveries |
| Next step | Referred to the Committee on Government Operations for further discussion |
Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic
HERE Resources
Boston Proposes Ban on Mopeds and E-Bikes for Food Delivery
Pedestrian Critically Injured in E-Bike Accident in Boston
Boston City Council Addresses Safety Concerns over Waymo’s Self-Driving Cars
Boston Council Debates Impact of Autonomous Vehicles
Cambridge Increases Parking Fines to Combat Violations
Tragic Incident in Boston’s Hyde Park Neighborhood
Boston’s New Ordinance: Delivery Permits for Safety
Additional Resources
- Rock 92.9: Boston City Council Debates New Safety Rules for Delivery Vehicles
- Boston.com: Ban on Two-Wheeled Food Delivery Vehicles Gets Cold Reception in City Council
- Boston Herald: Boston City Councilors Push to Ban Motorbike Deliveries, Falls Flat with Colleagues
- NBC Boston: Amazon Delivery Van Catches Fire in Boston’s Ted Williams Tunnel
- Boston Herald: Boston City Councilor Eyes Ban on Motorbike Deliveries, Can No Longer Be the Wild West
- Wikipedia: Delivery Service
- Google Search: Boston City Council delivery vehicles
- Google Scholar: Boston City Council delivery vehicles
- Encyclopedia Britannica: Delivery Service
- Google News: Boston City Council delivery vehicles
Author: STAFF HERE BOSTON WRITER
BOSTON STAFF WRITER The BOSTON STAFF WRITER represents the experienced team at HEREBoston.com, your go-to source for actionable local news and information in Boston, Suffolk County, and beyond. Specializing in "news you can use," we cover essential topics like product reviews for personal and business needs, local business directories, politics, real estate trends, neighborhood insights, and state news affecting the area—with deep expertise drawn from years of dedicated reporting and strong community input, including local press releases and business updates. We deliver top reporting on high-value events such as Boston Marathon, Head of the Charles Regatta, and Boston Harborfest. Our coverage extends to key organizations like the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce and Associated Industries of Massachusetts, plus leading businesses in finance, biotech, and insurance that power the local economy such as Fidelity Investments, Biogen, and Liberty Mutual Insurance. As part of the broader HERE network, we provide comprehensive, credible insights into Massachusetts's dynamic landscape.
